![]() The outcome of that review, published in 1994, was Access to Justice – an action plan, a 500-page document that made numerous recommendations. Let’s see where that goes.Īs I said, in 1993 I was a member of the advisory committee, commissioned by Australia’s then Attorney-General, Michael Lavarch, inspired, I believe by then Minister for Justice, Duncan Kerr, to consider ways in which our legal system could be reformed in order to enhance access to justice and make the legal system fairer, more efficient and more effective.Īnother aim, if you like, was to consider ways to make the system fairer, simpler and more affordable. Then I’d like to challenge you a bit on whether there really is a problem with access to justice. I’d like to begin by telling you a little about my experience on the advisory committee that compiled the report into access to justice under chairman Justice Ronald Sackville QC in 1993. Ladies and gentlemen, it’s a pleasure to be here to talk to you this afternoon with my New Zealand counterpart Ron about where ombudsmen fit in the justice landscape. Guidance for complaint handlers on dealing with risks of harmĪccess to justice – where do Ombudsmen fit in? 2014 ANZOA Conference Museum of New Zealand, Wellington 30 April 2014, Colin Neave, Commonwealth Ombudsman (With Prof Ron Paterson, NZ Ombudsman) Introduction Immigration assessments tabled in Parliament on 14 February 2022 Immigration assessments tabled in Parliament on 17 February 2022 Immigration assessments tabled in Parliament on 7 April 2022 Commonwealth Ombudsman Insights-Managing Unreasonable PersistenceĬommonwealth Ombudsman Insights-Preventing and Managing Administrative DelayĬommonwealth Ombudsman Insights Factsheet-Preventing and Managing Administrative Delay
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |